Legal Opinion

Pritel v. Burris

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 10, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 N.J. Super. 485 (1967)

229 A.2d 257

MARY JANE PRITEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ROBERT BURRIS, TOWNSHIP CLERK, CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CAMDEN COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT, AND EUGENE FELDMAN, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 10, 1967.

Decided April 10, 1967.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Frank E. Vittori argued the cause for appellant Feldman (Messrs. Piarulli & Vittori, attorneys).

Mr. Barry M. Weinberg argued the cause for respondent Pritel (Mr. Arnold N. Fishman, of counsel).

Mr. Warren C. Douglas argued the cause for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wene v. MeynerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Kilmurray v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Sharrock v. KeansburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Horwitz v. ReichensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. In Re MooreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. State Canvassing BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Afran v. County of SomersetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  3. In Re Keogh-DwyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. In Re HolmesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Committee v. CasagrandeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API