Legal Opinion

Horwitz v. Reichenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 22, 1954PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vanderbilt, C. J.

I

The plaintiff was a candidate for the office of ward councilman from the East Ward of Newark at the city election to be held on May 11, 1954 for the selection of a mayor, four eouncilmen at large and five ward chairmen, one of whom is to be chosen from each of the five wards set up for that purpose under the Mayor-Council Plan C of the Faulkner Act, N. J. S. A. 40:69A-55 to 40:69A-60.

In his petition for nomination the plaintiff gave as his address 168 Adams Street in the East Ward, but the superintendent of elections ruled that his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hackensack Water Co. v. RutaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DownieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Accountemps Division of Robert Half of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Birch Tree Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Silverman v. BerksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Pritel v. BurrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Public AdvocateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API