Legal Opinion
Bacon v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1934No. Docket No. 9416PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Respondents filed a contest to the will of Jennie E. Hartley. The contest was based upon three grounds: 1. Incompetency of Jennie E. Hartley; 2. Lack of due execution; and 3. Undue influence of Carl E'. Wagner. The trial was had before a jury. After respondents had rested their case appellant moved for a nonsuit on all of said grounds and same was denied. Thereupon the trial continued and the jury returned a verdict that the testatrix was of unsound mind at the time she executed the will; that the said will was not executed in the manner and form required by law and that it was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Estate of AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- McDonald v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estate of TrefrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Burgess v. BohleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Thomsen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hughes v. GrandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Estate of KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.