Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Bohle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1944No. Civ. 14327PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This litigation involves a contest before probate of the last will of Annie B. Hull, deceased. The contest was instituted by Alexina P. Burgess of Suffield, Connecticut, a sister and sole surviving relative of the decedent, and Hollywood Congregational Church. The defendant and proponent of the will is Martin F. Bohle, who is not related to the testatrix.

The cause proceeded to trial before the court sitting without a jury, and at the conclusion of the contestants’ case the court granted a motion for a nonsuit, and admitted the contested will to probate. Contestants prosecute this appeal from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Nolan v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Estate of BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Estate of FritschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hubbard v. DaBellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Peterson v. McMickenWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re O'Connor's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API