Legal Opinion

Uihlein v. Uihlein

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1953PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

These appeals raise the following issues:(1) Is the widow who has elected to take her one-third share of the estate, pursuant to sec. 233.14, Stats., entitled to such share without deduction therefrom of any portion of the- federal estate tax?(2) Does the widow’s election to take under the law extinguish the special power given to the widow under the will to appoint the residue of the estate upon her death among the nieces and nephews of the deceased, their descendants, and certain charities?(3) Does the widow’s election to take under the law have the same effect as her death and thereby…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ruggles v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pitts v. HamrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Hammond v. WheelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Roy B. Thompson, Jr., of the Will of Roy B. Thompson, Deceased v. Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. In Re the Estate of RettenmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Hohensee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API