Legal Opinion · Dissent

First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Bischoff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1963Published

1DissentCurrie, J.

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court.

The 999 shares of capital stock of the Patrick Cudahy Family Company to which Article VI of the will relates constituted part of the assets of an inter vivos trust. Under the provisions of the trust there was no possibility of any of these 999 shares becoming part of the assets of the estate of testatrix Josephine C. Hoyt. As fully explained in our opinion in In re Patrick Cudahy Family Trust, ante, p. 198, 125 N. W. (2d) 344, at the time testatrix died the only right, which testatrix had with respect to such 999 shares, was that of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Donges's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Marsh v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Estate of SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. McManany v. SheridanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Volk v. StowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API