Legal Opinion
Allbright-Nell Co. v. Stanley Hiller Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 20, 1934No. 4995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Appellant challenges the decree in tote. It denies liability for infringement on several grounds; one of them being that upon the findings of fact made by the court, its manufacture of the infringing products prior to the commencement of the suit was under and hy virtue of the exclusive license which appellee had granted to it. It contends that it fully and properly accounted for all royalties due under said license contract, and it denies the facts upon whieh it is ordered to turn over its interest in the second patent to appellee.
The complaint was filed on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Walker Grain Co. v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. GerlaskeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Transparent-Wrap MacHine Corp. v. Stokes & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Santa Cruz Oil Corporation v. Allbright-Nell Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Krantz v. Van DetteDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
- In re Allbright-Nell Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Stokes & Smith Co. v. Transparent-Wrap MacH. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.