Legal Opinion

Krantz v. Van Dette

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 5, 1958No. Civ. A. 30956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, District Judge.

In this, action, Walter Krantz, an inventor, seeks to recover from Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette, brothers, the sum of $350,000. He claims this amount is due him as accrued royalties under three license agreements whereby he granted to defendants the exclusive right to make, use and sell, in certain counties in Ohio and Indiana, storm windows described in plaintiff’s nine applications for patent which had theretofore been filed in the United States Patent Office.

Royalties had been paid under the license agreements to September 1949, when defendants claim…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Wallace v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Crown Machine & Tool Co. v. D & S Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1967
  3. Superior Testers, Inc. v. Damco Testers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  4. Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van DetteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API