Transparent-Wrap MacHine Corp. v. Stokes & Smith Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
This is a suit for a declaratory judgment (Judicial Code § 274d, 28 U. S. C. § 400) and an injunction, instituted by respondent for the determination of the legality and enforceability of a provision of a patent license agreement. The District Court, whose jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship (Judicial Code § 24 (1), 28 U. S. C. §41 (1)), entered judgment for petitioner, holding the provision valid. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed by a divided vote, 156 F. 2d 198, being of the opinion that the provision in question was illegal under the line of decisions represented by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.