Legal Opinion

Transparent-Wrap MacHine Corp. v. Stokes & Smith Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1947No. 208PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment (Judicial Code § 274d, 28 U. S. C. § 400) and an injunction, instituted by respondent for the determination of the legality and enforceability of a provision of a patent license agreement. The District Court, whose jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship (Judicial Code § 24 (1), 28 U. S. C. §41 (1)), entered judgment for petitioner, holding the provision valid. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed by a divided vote, 156 F. 2d 198, being of the opinion that the provision in question was illegal under the line of decisions represented by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API