Legal Opinion
York v. City of Wichita Falls, Tex.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 29, 1989No. Civ. A. CA-7-87-20PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
MARY LOU ROBINSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement. Plaintiffs’ Motions are granted and Defendant's Motions are denied.
Plaintiffs are fire fighters employed by the City of Wichita Falls, Texas. In June of 1985 the City unilaterally reduced the wages of the fire fighters to bring its overtime compensation payment into compliance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Garcia v. San Antonio Metro.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Knecht v. City of Redwood CityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert R. York, Cross-Appellants v. City of Wichita Falls, Texas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Thomas v. County of Fairfax, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Service Employees International Union, Local 102 v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1992
- Robert R. York v. City of Wichita Falls, Tx., Michael J. Herbert v. City of Wichita Falls, Tx.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Professional Firefighters v. City of ClaytonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.