Legal Opinion

Bogan v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. 4997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELD, J., pro tern.

In this action, plaintiff claims damages of defendants for personal injuries suffered by her as a result of a collision between the automobile of defendant J. E. White and that of defendant H. Bahr. A jury returned its verdict against plaintiff, and in favor of both defendants, and judgment on the verdict was entered accordingly. Plaintiff moved for a new trial on all the statutory grounds except, of course, excessive damages, and on May 19, 1933, an order was entered “granting the motion of plaintiff for a new trial upon the grounds among others of the insufficiency of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nickell v. RosenfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Pascoe v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Wilmon v. ArosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Packer v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Merrill v. FiniganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ducat v. GoldnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Rangel v. BadolatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hall v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Wilcox v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API