Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Epstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1944No. Civ. 14318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

The trial court found that the defendant, who was driving an automobile that struck the three and a half year old plaintiff, William Wilcox, was not guilty of any negligence, and as a consequence of this finding alone, the judgment denying the plaintiffs any relief, because of the accident, is supported by the findings. Plaintiffs’ appeal from the judgment is grounded upon the contention that the evidence does not support the finding referred to. We have concluded that the evidence cannot be said to be insufficient...The paths upon whose intersection the accident happened,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haase v. Central Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Stacey v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Cornell v. Hearst Sunical Land & Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Bogan v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rickey v. KardassakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API