Legal Opinion

In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Ford

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. S-11504PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Although the superior court directed attorney William T. Ford to deposit a $20,000 check in Ford's client trust account, Ford mailed the uncashed check back to the out-of-state payor. Because Ford knowingly "disobey[ed] an order of a tribunal" in violation of Alaska Rule of Professional Conduct 34(c), the disciplinary board of the Alaska Bar Association recommended that Ford be suspended from practice for ninety days. In exercising our responsibility for attorney discipline in Alaska, we independently conclude that a ninety-day suspension is appropriate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WestAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving TriemAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Disciplinary Matter Involving FrostAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BrionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Matter Involving SheaAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Discipline of Donald GilbertUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving StepovichAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. HeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API