In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Stepovich
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A few months after reinstatement to the Alaska Bar from a two-year suspension, an attorney violated Alaska Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(c) by drafting a friend’s will that named • him as the contingent beneficiary. The friend died leaving a considerable estate, but the attorney inherited nothing.
The Bar brought a disciplinary action against the attorney and stipulated that his violation of Rule 1.8(c) was negligent, punishable by public censure. The Bar’s Disciplinary Board, however, found that sanction too lenient in light of the attorney’s prior…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against VanDerbeekWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against VanderbeekWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steven R. Barela v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Paul Kulig (Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Ward M. Merdes, Attorney.Alaska Supreme Court · 2022