Legal Opinion

State v. McMilliam

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1956No. 291PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Upon the call of the case for trial, and before pleading to the indictment, the defendants made a motion to suppress the State’s evidence, for the reason that the State’s evidence was procured by an unlawful search warrant, or secured without a search warrant, and was, therefore, incompetent as evidence. The court stated that it would reserve its ruling on the motion, until after the State had rested its case. Whereupon, the defendants entered pleas of Not Guilty.

After the jury was impanelled the State offered its evidence, which tended to show these facts. On 12 May 1955 Wayne Lane, a Deputy…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. GastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API