Legal Opinion

State v. Littlejohn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1965No. 5PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The principal assignment of error relates to the admission in evidence, as against all of the defendants and over their objection, of a purported declaration of defendant Moore made after his arrest, and made in the absence of the other defendants. The declaration was made to P. L. Barnette, owner of the stolen tires, and to police officers.

The declaration was to this effect: Moore received an “order” for some tires from a man who resided in or near Landrum, S. C. On Sunday, 7 June 1964, Moore and the' Littlejohns were together and discussed the “deal.” They were at the home of LeRoy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. McMilliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. . RaperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API