Legal Opinion

Reid v. Mercury Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 2013No. B241154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIMES, J.

SUMMARY

This case involves an insurer’s duty to its insured to settle a third party claim within policy limits, when liability is clear and there is a substantial likelihood of a recovery in excess of policy limits. The question is whether the insurer, in the absence of any demand or settlement offer from the third party claimant, must initiate settlement negotiations or offer its policy limits, and if so how quickly it must do so, to avoid a claim of bad faith failure to settle.

In this case, the insured’s liability was clear almost immediately after the collision. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. McDaniel v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Bradley Sharp v. Evanston Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Gallardo-Pinedo v. Aegis Security Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Graciano v. Mercury General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API