McDaniel v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Defendant-Appellant Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) ap*615peals the judgement entered following the district court’s grant of Plaintiff-Appellee Amy J. McDaniel’s motion for summary judgment and denial of GEICO’s cross-motion for summary judgment on McDaniel’s breach of the implied duty to settle third party lawsuits (implied duty to settle) claim. We review both grants and denials of summary judgment de novo. United States v. Washington, 827 F.3d 836, 849 (9th Cir. 2016).
McDaniel is the assignee of an implied duty to settle claim against GEICO. McDaniel alleges that in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- CHATEAU CHAMBERAY HOA v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hedayati v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Auto. ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Matarazzo v. Geico General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Nease v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019