Legal Opinion
People v. Zimmerman
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Jaspan, J.
The primary question presented here is whether the exclusionary rule should be invoked in a case where the police acting in good faith made a judgmental error in relying on defendant’s apparent consent to search the trunk of an automobile parked in a public place.
Subsidiary issues exist with respect to the interpretation of People v Boodle (47 NY2d 398), and People v Middleton (54 NY2d 474), and as to statements attributed to the defendant.
*122In denying the motion of defendant to suppress by applying a good-faith rule to “judgmental errors”, a distinction…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1984