Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 2, 1989No. 69363PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

539 So.2d 464 (1989)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Martin Leslie WELLS, Respondent.

No. 69363.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 2, 1989.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joseph N. D'Achille, Jr. and Fleming Lee, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, and Elizabeth Masters and Walter M. Meginniss, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Sharon W. Ehrenreich of Moore & Ehrenreich, Gainesville, for respondent.

Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel and R.W. Evans, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

2Per curiam

On motion for rehearing by petitioner, we…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by104 opinions

  1. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Autran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Bostick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API