Legal Opinion

Dumbolton v. Oregon Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1936No. 26167. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

East Marginal way, for some distance south of Spokane avenue, in the city of Seattle, is a wide north and south street, consisting of two twenty-foot strips of pavement on either side of an unpaved area. At the time of the accident hereinafter referred to, there was located, on East Marginal way, a switching' track, maintained by defendant Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company. At different places, branch switching tracks crossed the easterly pavement at an angle.

About eight o’clock on the morning of February 13, 1934, plaintiff, Charles J. Dumbolton, was driving his truck, which,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. McFadden v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Eldredge v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Spokane County v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Meyer v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hendrickson v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Ullrich v. Columbia & CowLitz Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Schofield v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API