Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 8022SC985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the selection of the jury on the grounds that beginning the voir dire with only eleven members of the jury venire violated the requirement of G.S. 15A-1214(a) that prospective jurors be called “from the panel by a system of random selection which precludes advance knowledge of the identity of the next juror to be called.” We agree with defendant that the court erred by proceeding to select a jury from a panel of only eleven. Not only was it certain that all eleven of the jurors would be placed in the box, but it was also impossible to “randomly select”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. StanfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Rose v. City of Rocky MountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. SloneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API