Legal Opinion

State v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1977No. 65PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendants first contend the court erred by permitting a witness to refuse to answer a question on cross-examination.

The State called as a witness, Ted Purpero, a Marine Corporal who testified that he first became acquainted with defendant Stanfield in May 1975, when Stanfield moved into the same residence. Purpero testified that on 7 July 1975, defendant Stanfield did not arrive home until 9:00 or 9:30 p.m. At the time, he “stormed into the house and said someone stripped his field and someone it going to pay for it.” Witness Purpero admitted on cross-examination that he…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. HamletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API