Legal Opinion

Smith v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 31, 2012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

Effective November 1, 2009, amendments to the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act, G. L. c. 258, §§ 1-14, and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA’s) enabling statute, G. L. c. 161A (collectively, 2009 amendments), made the MBTA a “public employer” covered by the Tort Claims Act. See G. L. c. 258, § 1, as amended through St. 2009, c. 25, § 123; G. L. c. 161A, § 38, as amended by St. 2009, c. 25, §§ 112, 113; St. 2009, c. 25, § 185, as amended by St. 2009, c. 26, § 60. This case presents the question whether the 2009 amendments apply retroactively, allowing the MBTA the protections…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Moe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. George v. National Water Main Cleaning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Sliney v. PreviteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API