Legal Opinion
Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 26, 2014PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
On July 12, 2013, the Governor signed into law various amendments to G. L. c. 6, §§ 178C-178Q, the sex offender registry law (SORL), including amendments that would *599require the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB) to publish on the Internet information contained in the sex offender registry (registry information) regarding all individuals given a level two or level three classification by SORB. See St. 2013, c. 38, §§ 7, 9. Before these amendments were enacted, § 178D required SORB to publish on the Internet the registry information of sex offenders given a level three classification, but…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 68549 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- MacKey v. Rootes Motors Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.