Legal Opinion
Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 30, 2000No. 24119-6-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a verdict in favor of Wal-Mart in a civil action alleging false imprisonment, battery, malicious prosecution, and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. We affirm.
Salvador Delgado Guijosa (Delgado), Rogelio Hernandez Guijosa (Guijosa), and Ricardo Hernandez (Hernandez) *783(collectively “plaintiffs”)1 filed this suit against Wal-Mart, claiming false imprisonment, battery, malicious prosecution, and a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, based on discrimination.
The claim arises from an alleged shoplifting incident at the Wal-Mart in Shelton,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Boyd v. KulczykCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Boyd v. KulczykCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Prostov v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.