Legal Opinion
Munroe v. Emhart Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 29, 1997No. AC 15065; AC 15277PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The defendant Emhart Corporation (Emhart)1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment, after a court trial, for the named plaintiff, William C. Munroe.2 Emhart claims in its appeal (AC 15065) that the trial court improperly failed to find that it had established a defense of accord and satisfaction. Munroe filed an independent appeal (AC 15277) claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to award him interest pursuant to General Statutes § 37-3a. We consolidated the appeals for hearing in this court and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Loomis Institute v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Lamb v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Gillis v. GillisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Paulus v. LaSalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- M.J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. City of West HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Flynn v. KaumeyerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Douthwright v. Northeast Corridor FoundationsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.