Legal Opinion
McKENNA v. Turpin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1958No. 19,006PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.
It is undisputed that on August 10, 1953, the appellants, as parties of the first part, and the appellee, as party of the second part, entered into a written contract which, omitting signatures, is in the following words and figures:
“For services rendered the party of the first part gives to the party of the second part the exclusive right to sell the following described real estate and improvements thereon, for a period of nine months from date thereof.
“Lots numbered 53; 54; 55; 56; 57; 62; 63; 64; 65; 66; 67; 68; 69; 70; 71; 72; 73; 74; 77; 78; 79; 80; 81; 82, in Shadeland Terrace, an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson Hill Coal & Coke Co. v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Palmer v. NewmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. HennesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gosslin v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Noblesville Redevelopment Commmission v. Noblesville Associates Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cromer v. SeftonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- George N. Goldman, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Steve C. Fadell, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.