Legal Opinion

U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. System Auto Parks, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided September 1, 1937No. Civ. A. No. 3691PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

On or about the 28th day of February, 1936, at approximately 11:45 P. M., an automobile owned by plaintiff and, with its consent, being operated by one Hubert Lejeune, as rentee, was by the latter driven into defendant’s *Supp. 784auto park at 743 South Spring Street, in Los Angeles. Defendant’s employee, Liles, accepted such automobile for parking, asked and received from the driver, Lejeune, the sum of 15 cents as a fee therefor, and gave to him a portion of a parking ticket bearing an identifying number. This transaction constituted a bailment for hire. (Beetson v. Hollywood Athletic Club,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Cussen v. Southern California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Gardner v. Jonathan ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Gardner v. Downtown Porsche AudiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API