Legal Opinion

Ambassador Airways, Inc. v. Frank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1932No. Docket No. 7127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Broadly stated, the action upon which the instant appeal is based was brought by the plaintiff against defendant for the purpose of recovering a judgment on account of moneys alleged to have been expended by the plaintiff in repairing an airplane which was the property of the plaintiff, but which had been damaged while in the possession of defendant. In said action additional damages were claimed by the plaintiff because of the loss of “service and use by the plaintiff” of the airplane during the time that it was undergoing repairs.

In greater detail, the facts appear to be that in the pursuit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Cussen v. Southern California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Greer v. Los Angeles Athletic ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. System Auto Parks, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
  3. Kaye v. M'DivaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Fuelberth v. SplittgerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Braman-Johnson Flying Service, Inc. v. ThomsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API