Hall v. Nalco Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Cheryl Hall maintains she was fired by Nalco Company for taking time off from work to undergo in vitro fertilization after' being diagnosed with infertility. She filed this suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”), alleging her termination constituted discrimination on the basis of sex. Without reaching the merits of her claim, the district court granted summary judgment for Nalco on the ground that Hall could not prove sex discrimination because infertility is a gender-neutral condition.
We reverse. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Patterson v. INDIANA NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Deboom v. Raining Rose, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Arizanovska v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Serednyj v. Beverly Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Andrew Dunlevy v. James LangfelderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.