Legal Opinion
Kettenring v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 9, 2008No. B197513PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J. *
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD or District) pays adult education teachers a regular periodic amount, identified as a “salary” in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, calculated by multiplying a flat hourly rate for each hour of classroom teaching. LAUSD does not pay for additional time spent outside of classroom instruction for preparation, grading or other tasks in connection with the class. Ernest Kettenring, an adult education teacher in the District, filed a class action lawsuit alleging that the compensation structure violates state minimum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. HellikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational ProgramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Areso v. CarMax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Negri v. Koning & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Chinonye Ugorji v. County of LakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.