Legal Opinion

Daniel D. Matz v. William C. Kelsch Duane L. Gourneau Jo Ann Yocum Irvin Riedman James Marion North Dakota State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1981No. 80-1842PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Matz, an inmate in the North Dakota State Penitentiary, submitted a complaint, construed by the District Court and here as a civil rights complaint, primarily under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the North Dakota State Board of Parole violated his due process rights in fixing the terms of his parole. Matz sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The District Court 1 granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ordered the complaint filed, and, prior to service of process, dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Matz filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Winsett v. McGinnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Rufus Lee Averhart v. Albert Tutsie, Parole Board ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Hayward v. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mahfouz v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Tomas G. Ervin v. David Blackwell and Donald R. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Mahfouz v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Patten v. North Dakota Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Love v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API