Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Procunier

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1980No. 78-3701PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal we must decide whether state prisoners’ constitutional rights to procedural due process and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment were violated by a five-month “lockdown”1 of the prison. The district court held that there was no constitutional violation. We agree and affirm.

FACTS:

Between 1970 and 1974 California’s San Quentin Prison became an increasingly turbulent institution. The rate of violent incidents more than tripled during this period, and the influence of prison gangs steadily grew. 1974 was a particularly violent year. There were 82 assaults…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Edwards v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  3. Toussaint v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  4. Edwards v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Richardson v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API