Legal Opinion

Rufus Lee Averhart v. Albert Tutsie, Parole Board Chairman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 9, 1980No. 78-2621PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

The primary issues raised in this appeal are (1) whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates more stringent procedures for parole release determinations than those followed by the Indiana Parole Board, and (2) whether the Indiana Administrative Adjudication Act (A.A.A.), Ind.Code § 4-22-1-1, et seq., applies to Parole Board proceedings. We hold that neither the Due Process Clause nor the Indiana A.A.A. applies to parole release determinations by the Indiana Parole Board.

I

Plaintiff, Rufus Averhart, is presently incarcerated in the Indiana State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Arnold v. Tennessee Board of ParolesTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hanrahan v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. William Heirens v. Larry MizellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. William Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board and Lou BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API