Legal Opinion

Wade v. Drexel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1895No. 9238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Anthony J. Drexel and others, as executors and trustees of the estate of Anthony J. Drexel, from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., granting the relief prayed for in the petition of C. C. Wade, and from an order refusing to grant a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The city lot involved in this proceeding is situated in Minneapolis. It was assessed for the taxes of 1889 as an entire tract, and on May 6, 1891, was sold to one Johnson for the sum of $229.26, in payment of these taxes, and these appellants now hold the rights acquired under that sale. One Penney was the owner of the lot. There was a mortgage on’the front two-thirds of it, which was foreclosed. The time to redeem from the foreclosure sale expired, and appellants now hold the rights acquired under the foreclosure. The respondent, Wade, is a judgment creditor of Penney, and his judgment is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lee v. SchaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Easton v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API