State Ex Rel. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Erickson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Boring, Justice.
Respondents, who owned part of a parcel of real estate in the platted portion of Minneapolis which had been sold as a whole to the state for taxes, petitioned the district court for an alternative writ of mandamus directing appellant, the auditor of Hennepin county, to show cause why he should not apportion the tax judgment under which the parcel was sold so that respondents could redeem their part of the parcel by paying their proportionate share of the tax judgment under Mason St. 1927, §§ 2158 and 2160. The writ was issued and the case tried. The court filed findings of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Stewart v. CaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City of Duluth v. DibbleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Williams v. KlemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State ex rel. Lee v. SchaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Wulff v. Tax Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- BODEL CORPORATION v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Howard Contracting Co. v. YeagerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945