Easton v. Scofield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Houston county, in favor of plaintiff, entered in pursuance of the findings • and order of Whytock, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The plaintiff sued out a writ of mandamus in the court below to compel the county auditor of Houston county to draw his warrant on the county treasurer for the amount of certain taxes, and interest thereon, which plaintiff claims he is entitled to have refunded to him, under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 1610. The case was tried by the court below, without a jury. The court found for plaintiff, and from a judgment entered in his favor the county auditor appeals.
The court found that the plaintiff bid off, at tax sale, certain undivided ninths of a certain tract of land in that county, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Sherin v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Holterhoff v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Wade v. DrexelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Wray v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoyt v. LightbodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Norton v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Moore v. CrispSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Otis v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Hoyt v. LightbodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.