Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided November 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 3:84-0722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDA OPINIONS AND ORDERS

NEESE, Senior District Judge, Sitting by Designation.

This is a pro se civil action by him for the judicial review of an assessment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of a civil penalty against the plaintiff and his spouse for filing a “frivolous” tax return. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1346(a); 26 U.S.C. §§ 6703(c), 7422(a). The defendants 1 moved for a summary judgment, contending that, as a matter of law, such assessment was proper. Rule 56(b), F.R.Civ.P. Such motion has merit.

I

The material facts are not in genuine dispute, see Rule 56(c), F.R.Civ.P.: The plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Beckelhimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
  3. Frost v. CommissionerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1985
  4. Vann v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API