Hill v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDA OPINIONS AND ORDERS
NEESE, Senior District Judge, Sitting by Designation.
This is a pro se civil action by him for the judicial review of an assessment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of a civil penalty against the plaintiff and his spouse for filing a “frivolous” tax return. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1346(a); 26 U.S.C. §§ 6703(c), 7422(a). The defendants 1 moved for a summary judgment, contending that, as a matter of law, such assessment was proper. Rule 56(b), F.R.Civ.P. Such motion has merit.
I
The material facts are not in genuine dispute, see Rule 56(c), F.R.Civ.P.: The plaintiff…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Beckelhimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Frost v. CommissionerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1985
- Vann v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985