Kelm v. Kelm
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The orders are not appealable. Sec. 274.33, Stats., describes the orders which may be brought to the supreme court by appeal, and neither of the orders under consideration is within that, statute. They are not final orders.
Orders similar to the first one mentioned in the statement of facts have in several instances been treated on ap*303peal as though they were appealable orders. In Donkle v. Milem, 88 Wis. 33, 59 N. W. 586, for instance, Mr. Justice Pinney said: “The order opening the judgment as to defendant Milem and allowing him to serve an answer and defend was an order ‘upon a summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Donkle v. MilemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Purcell v. KleaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Ledebuhr v. Grand Grove of Wisconsin of the Order of DruidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Hanson v. CusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lehner v. Berlin Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Moore v. HahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Old Port Brewing Corp. v. C. W. Fischer Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Hargraves v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.