Legal Opinion

Lehner v. Berlin Publishing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933:

Fowler, J.

The appellants contend that the trial court should have (1) directed a verdict for defendants because the article was a true and fair report of a judicial proceeding, or (2) should have submitted to the jury whether it was such report; (3) evidence was erroneously received over the objection of defendants; (4) the court erroneously refused to instruct the jury as requested by the defendants; (5) the court erred in submitting the question of defendants’ express malice to the jury; (6) the court erred in including exemplary damages in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Shinglemeyer v. Wright.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fahr v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  4. Luther v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McAllister v. Kimberly-Clark Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Entzminger v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Jolitz v. FintchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wagner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fuchs v. KupperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API