Lehner v. Berlin Publishing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933:
Fowler, J.
The appellants contend that the trial court should have (1) directed a verdict for defendants because the article was a true and fair report of a judicial proceeding, or (2) should have submitted to the jury whether it was such report; (3) evidence was erroneously received over the objection of defendants; (4) the court erroneously refused to instruct the jury as requested by the defendants; (5) the court erred in submitting the question of defendants’ express malice to the jury; (6) the court erred in including exemplary damages in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Shinglemeyer v. Wright.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Fahr v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- Luther v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- McAllister v. Kimberly-Clark Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Entzminger v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Jolitz v. FintchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wagner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Fuchs v. KupperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.