Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1912PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Clackamas. James A. Eakin, Judge. This is a suit by Charles D. Taylor against Minnie N. Taylor for a divorce. From an order entered by the lower court vacating a default decree, plaintiff appeals. Respondent files motion to dismiss appeal which motion is sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Cpiief Justice Eakin.

1, This is a suit for a divorce. Defendant was served with summons by publication, and default and decree were rendered against her. Thereafter, within a year, defendant appeared under Section 59, L. O. L., which provides that “the defendant against whom publication is ordered * * may * * upon good cause shown, and upon such terms as may be proper, be allowed to defend after judgment * ■* on such terms as may be just, * * and by motion supported by affidavit asked to be allowed to defend the suit, and at the same time tendered her answer.

This application was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Blumauer-Frank Drug Co. v. Horticultural Fire ReliefOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sears v. DunbarOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Waymire v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Commercial National Bank v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pullen v. EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smith Typewriter Co. v. McGeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API