Hargraves v. Hoffmann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
The order is not appealable. There has heretofore been some doubt as to the appealability of an order vacating a default or opening a judgment on cognovit. In several of the cases cited by the plaintiff an appeal was taken from an order opening a default, and consideration was given to the merits of the order, there having been no question raised as to its appealability. Sawicki v. Wulff, 169 Wis. 377, 172 N. W. 722; Wessling v. Hieb, 180 Wis. 160, 192 N. W. 458; O’Brien v. Rice, 186 Wis. 523, 203 N. W. 332; Velte v. Zeh, 188 Wis! 401, 206 N. W. 197. The question of the appealability of such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wessling v. HiebWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Kelm v. KelmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Hanson v. CusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Velte v. ZehWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Burnham Bros. Brick Co. v. RiesenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Old Port Brewing Corp. v. C. W. Fischer Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Bergen v. SchrodiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965