Legal Opinion

Hargraves v. Hoffmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The order is not appealable. There has heretofore been some doubt as to the appealability of an order vacating a default or opening a judgment on cognovit. In several of the cases cited by the plaintiff an appeal was taken from an order opening a default, and consideration was given to the merits of the order, there having been no question raised as to its appealability. Sawicki v. Wulff, 169 Wis. 377, 172 N. W. 722; Wessling v. Hieb, 180 Wis. 160, 192 N. W. 458; O’Brien v. Rice, 186 Wis. 523, 203 N. W. 332; Velte v. Zeh, 188 Wis! 401, 206 N. W. 197. The question of the appealability of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wessling v. HiebWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Kelm v. KelmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hanson v. CusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Velte v. ZehWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Burnham Bros. Brick Co. v. RiesenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Old Port Brewing Corp. v. C. W. Fischer Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bergen v. SchrodiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API