Smith v. Washington
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-Appellant, James Smith (Smith), appeals the trial court’s conclusion that the damages awarded to him be reduced by fifty percent (50%). Defendants Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Wilbert Washington, M.D., (Washington), cross-appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Smith.
We reverse in part and affirm in part.
■ISSUES
Smith raises several issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as:
1. Whether the trial court properly applied § 323 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts to this action.
2. Whether the trial court properly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Daugherty v. Robinson Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Scott v. CrussenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Indiana Department of Insurance, Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. EverhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.