Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Stump

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1941No. Civ. 6297PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONOUR, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court after granting a motion for nonsuit. Plaintiffs’ complaint was in three counts, alleging negligence on the part of the defendant physician in his treatment of plaintiff Doris Anderson. The complaint sets forth the usual allegations as to the plaintiffs engaging the defendant to attend Mrs. Anderson; that she was pregnant and shortly to be delivered of a child; and that she placed herself under the care of the defendant in the Knapp Hospital in Crescent City.

In the first cause of action it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Crowe v. McBrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API