MBL (USA) Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Aquilino, Judge:
Following the court’s Slip Op. 90-23, 14 CIT 161, 733 F. Supp. 379 (1990), familiarity with which is presumed, the plaintiffs have filed motions for summary judgment on their remaining asserted causes of action for release of bonds and refund of deposits of estimated antidumping duties on imports of power-transmission belts from Japan and Singapore entered between February 1 and June 7, 1989.
I
The dates specified are those on which the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) published its Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ipsco, Inc., and Ipsco Steel, Inc. v. The United States, Lone Star Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Metallverken Nederland B v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Metallverken Nederland B v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- MBL (USA) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Siemens Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993