MBL (USA) Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Aquilino, Judge:
The plaintiffs commenced the above-encaptioned actions by service and filing of form summonses and of complaints, demanding in each instance
judgment ordering the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, to amend the Antidumping Duty Order * * * so that it releases the bonds or refunds deposits (with interest) given or made on entries or withdrawals from warehouse for consumption of industrial power transmission [V-]belts * * * made from February 1,1989 to June 7, 1989, and states that such entries or withdrawals from warehouse [for consumption]…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brecoflex Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- MBL (USA) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Mitsuboshi Belting Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Mitsuboshi Belting Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Okaya (USA), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003