Legal Opinion

Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 6, 1993No. Court No. 89-07-00399; Court No. 89-07-00430Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

Aquilino, Judge:

In Slip Op. 92-26, 16 CIT 133, 787 F. Supp. 224 (1992), familiarity with which is presumed, this court granted in part motions of the above-named plaintiffs focused on the affirmative determination of the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) sub nom. Industrial Belts from Israel, Italy, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, The United Kingdom, and West Germany, 54 Fed.Reg. 24,430 (June 7, 1989). In particular, the motions challenge the determination insofar as it is based on the views of Commissioner David B. Rohr, who concluded that material injury did not exist…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API