Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Vidalia Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1931No. 20618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The following description of mortgaged property as contained in the mortgage is sufficiently specific and certain for the purpose of identifying the property: “My entire crop of all kinds, consisting of cotton, cotton-seed, corn, fodder, peas, potatoes, sugar-cane, tobacco, *491melons, and any and all other produce grown and now being grown, and to be grown during the current year, by me on the lands described as follows: adjoining lands of-' in the---district of Montgomery County, Georgia, whereupon I farm the present year, and also upon said crops after the same are gathered and housed.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Read Phosphate Co. v. Weichselbaum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Duke v. Neisler & NewsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Big Z WarehouseDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  2. Brooks v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Lane v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API