Barbo v. Bassett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Koon, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiff was employed by defendants as a laborer in their saw-mill, and commenced work on the 25th day of April, 1885. His principal business was to assist in sawing slabs. He was also required to assist another employe, styled an “edger,”.. as occasion might require, in lifting heavy plank upon the edger’s table, which was moved rapidly over rollers by means of cogs connected with the machinery of the mill. While at his ordinary work he stood with his back towards the table, and to attend to this special work he was obliged to turn, and go about six feet across a passageway from his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Craver v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Hutchinson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Erickson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Beard v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Craver v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.